KPMG’s role as auditor in HBOS collapse back under mircoscope
The Financial Reporting Council’s Conduct Committee has today instructed its Executive Counsel to launch a fresh preliminary investigation into the conduct of KPMG in its role as auditor of HBOS prior to the group’s collapse and subsequent £25 billion taxpayer bailout.
The probe will invoke the FRC’s Accountancy Scheme, the disciplinary scheme for members and member firms of the accounting profession where matters involve important issues affecting the public interest in the UK.
The FRC said that the inquiry will focus on the extent to which KPMG, during the course of their audit, “considered the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption in the preparation of the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2007” and if it “considered whether there were material uncertainties about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern that HBOS needed to disclose in the financial statements.”
The FRC said its Executive Counsel will present his findings to the Conduct Committee which will then decide whether KPMG or any Member are liable to investigation.
Welcoming to the news, the Institude of Directors called for the new inquiry to be carried out in a “timely fashion”.
Simon Walker, director general of the IoD, said: “The failure of HBOS was one of the bleakest events in Britain’s corporate history. While the financial services industry, and the health of Britain’s economy, has come a long way since then, it is essential that every possible lesson is learnt from what happened at HBOS. It is clear that the bank’s senior executives fostered a toxic culture of short-termism which ultimately brought the organisation to its knees. However, this is far from the full picture.
“Shareholders and customers deserve to know what role the firm’s auditors, KPMG, played in this scandal. The announcement of this long-overdue inquiry, therefore, is better late than never. External audits must be rigorous and fit for purpose, especially when it comes to systemically important and bewilderingly complex financial institutions. It is absolutely right, therefore, that the FRC will look hard at HBOS’s financial statements at the appropriateness of the ‘going concern’ statement offered by the bank in 2007.
“There is more at stake here than just the integrity of a few regulators and the inquiry cannot just be about spreading blame. It is critical that the FRC review is rigorous and transparent, and that it provides relevant and timely updates to key stakeholders. We urge the FRC to dedicate sufficient resources to conduct this inquiry as quickly and thoroughly as possible and not dilly-dally. Shareholders need confidence in the financial statements offered by companies and they have a right to know that auditors are properly scrutinising the books.”