And finally…poverty can limit intelligence –depending on where you live

Light BulbPoverty has long been linked with lower levels of intelligence, especially among children, but a new study carried out by experts at Edinburgh University has suggested its impact may depend on where you live.

The in­flu­ence of genes on in­tel­li­gence varies by so­cial class in the Un­ited States, but not in West­ern Eu­rope or Aus­tral­ia, ac­cord­ing to the new research carried out along with academics at the University of Texas and com­piled with re­sults from 14 pre­vi­ous stud­ies.

Re­search­ers ten­ta­tively at­trib­ut­ed the find­ings—pub­lished in the jour­nal Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence—to the ef­fect of stronger so­cial safe­ty nets in those oth­er coun­tries such as universal access to healthcare, which has helped to close some socioeconomic gaps.

Past re­search sug­gests that both genes and context shape in­tel­li­gence with scientists believing a person’s intelligence is formed by a complex interplay between the genes they inherit from their parents and the environment they grow up in.



But the study of twins has determined that childhood poverty appears to ‘dampen down’ the potential contained within a person’s genes - and the situation varies from country to country.

A pop­u­lar hy­poth­e­sis is that genes con­fer a po­ten­tial in­tel­li­gence, but wheth­er this po­ten­tial en­tirely bears fruit de­pends on wheth­er the en­vi­ron­ment is sup­port­ive and nur­tur­ing—or poor and dis­ad­van­taged.

Some stud­ies have sup­ported this view; oth­ers haven’t.

In the new work, psy­chol­o­gists Tim­o­thy Bates at the Un­ivers­ity of Ed­in­burgh and El­li­ot Tucker-Drob of the Un­ivers­ity of Tex­as at Aus­tin con­ducted a “meta-analysis,” a study that com­bines da­ta from pre­vi­ous stud­ies.

The pair said they used all avail­a­ble pub­lished and un­pub­lished stud­ies meet­ing spe­cif­ic con­di­tions.

The stud­ies had to con­tain an ob­jec­tive meas­ure of in­tel­li­gence, a meas­ure of par­ti­ci­pants’ family so­ci­o­ec­on­om­ic sta­tus in child­hood, and par­ti­ci­pants that var­ied in re­lat­ed­ness (i.e., sib­lings ver­sus iden­ti­cal twins) to al­low for sta­tis­tic­ally dis­en­tan­gling ge­net­ic and en­vi­ron­men­tal in­flu­ences.

Tucker-Drob and Bates an­a­lysed da­ta from a to­tal of 24,926 pairs of twins and sib­lings who had par­ti­ci­pated in stud­ies in­de­pend­ently con­ducted in the Un­ited States, Aus­tral­ia, the UK, Swe­den, Ger­ma­ny, and the Neth­er­lands.

“The hy­poth­e­sis that the ge­net­ic in­flu­ence on in­tel­li­gence de­pends on so­ci­o­ec­on­om­ic sta­tus was not sup­ported in stud­ies out­side of the U.S.,” said Tucker-Drob.

“In the Neth­er­lands, there was even ev­i­dence sug­ges­tive of the op­po­site ef­fect.”

The study showed no ev­i­dence that oth­er fac­tors in­flu­enced the re­sults, such as age of test­ing, wheth­er the tests meas­ured achieve­ment and knowl­edge or in­tel­li­gence and wheth­er the tests were of a sin­gle abil­ity or a com­pos­ite cog­ni­tive meas­ures.

The re­search­ers sug­gest that the dif­fer­ence be­tween the Un­ited States and oth­er coun­tries might be due to stronger health and so­cial wel­fare pro­grams in West­ern Eu­rope and Aus­tral­ia, which might re­duce pover­ty’s neg­a­tive ef­fects.

Differences in the education systems in the countries may also play a role.

Professor Bates said that studies from Australia and Britain found that IQ showed high levels of heritability, and that this was equal across all levels of social class.

“We showed that Britain and Australia have created a level playing field where class is no longer a limiting factor for the expression of genetic potential”, he said.

“So the playing field can be tipped, as it was in America a little towards the rich. But it can be levelled, and can even end up tipped the other way.

‘This was a surprising and new finding that was not predicted by existing science.

“Our explanation so far points to differences in how the education systems are run in different countries. Australia has a federal system with strong national standards. So too does the UK.

Share icon
Share this article: